Follow your curiosity

What discovery has been shared with you?

Start with one fact. Explore it, go deeper, then follow whichever branch catches your imagination.

Choose subjects for a surprise

Exploring any topic

Begin your discovery

Your next discovery is one click away.

Choose one or more subjects above, or leave Any Topic selected and let curiosity decide.

Philosophy

The Metaphysics of Properties: Universals versus Tropes

Quick fact

The debate between universals and tropes has been alive since Plato and Aristotle, but it remains central to contemporary metaphysics—and it directly influences how philosophers interpret scientific laws.

Why this is interesting

Why do two red apples both seem to share the same color? Is there really a single 'redness' that exists in both, or is each apple's redness a private, one-of-a-kind trait?

Read the full explanation

Understanding The Metaphysics of Properties: Universals versus Tropes

Think of properties as the 'adjectives' of reality—the shapes, colors, and masses that things have. When we say two balls are both round, we are saying they share a property. But what exactly does 'sharing' mean? One answer says there exists a single, 'one-over-many' entity—the universal 'roundness'—that is fully present in both balls. The other answer says there is no single shared entity; instead, each ball has its own particular 'roundness-trope.' These two views offer very different pictures of similarity: universals make resemblance literal identity, while tropes make it a matter of exact similarity between distinct individuals.

A deeper explanation

The universals view (realism) meshes naturally with the idea that there are stable kinds and law-like regularities: both red apples instantiate the same universal, so they truly are similar. The tropes view (trope nominalism) treats every property as a particular, existing only in its bearer; thereby it avoids the strange 'multi-location' of a single entity. However, it then must explain how distinct tropes can be exactly similar—often by positing a primitive resemblance relation. This contrast also drives different theories of substances: with universals, an object is often seen as a substratum 'bare particular' that instantiates universals; with tropes, an object can be viewed as a bundle of tropes. The choice has repercussions for identity (how things persist), causation (whether power transfer involves universals), and the nature of laws (whether they are grounded in universal relations or statistical regularities among tropes).

Keep FACTREE close

Internet access is required. Updates arrive when you reopen or reload the app. You may need to sign in again in the installed app.