Philosophy
Counterfactuals and Possible Worlds Semantics
Quick fact
Classical logic's truth table says that 'If P, then Q' is true whenever P is false—so the claim 'If the moon is made of cheese, then 2+2=5' would be true. This paradox shows why counterfactuals need a richer semantic framework, one that compares actuality with nearby possible worlds.
Why this is interesting
If I had not dropped the glass, it would not have shattered. What makes that statement true? The glass did break, so how do we judge a claim about a scenario that never happened?