Economics
The Business Method Patent Eligibility Under Alice Test
Quick fact
In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that implementing an abstract idea (like intermediated settlement) on a generic computer does not make it patent-eligible, leading to the invalidation of thousands of software and business method patents.
Why this is interesting
Imagine you invented a better way to sell products online, and you get a patent, only to have it invalidated in court because it's an 'abstract idea'—even though it's profitable. How can the law decide what's eligible for a patent?